Klaus Is My Hero

“…….whether it comes from frustration, anger or disconnection, there are people in Canada right now who need to lash out at who ever they see who’s in charge.” Words from a year end Trudeau interview. And while the Toronto Star congratulated itself on the obvious merits of enrolling Susan Delacourt to engage the Prime Minister on issues of interest, we can say without fear of contradiction that Ms. Delacourt failed to throw out one hardball question. College undergraduates would have delivered more. In that somewhat awkward Trudeau assessment of fellow Canadians he tells the real story of a Prime Minister lost in his own labyrinth of political passages and secret chambers.

First the frustration. Many of his fellow Canadians remain frustrated by his abject hatred of those who don’t embrace his way of thinking. They remain frustrated by his congratulations to the people of Quebec for their enthusiastic acceptance of Covid 19 vaccinations, “not like the people in other parts of Canada.” Some Canadians are frustrated by his propensity to hide legislative plans, and excuse his own mistakes even when they become obvious embarrassments. He continues with words and actions to proselytize racist division among Canadians. In his Star interview he did it again with a racist dig at the Leader of the Opposition. Pierre Poilievre, he said, is merely pining for a time “..where men were men and white men ruled.” Totally uncalled for and nonsensical and said in anger.

Only an angry, frustrated man would lash out at fellow citizens and call them despicable names as the Prime Minister has done many times. He’s angry because a year ago his frustration to clear the streets of Ottawa forced him to use heavily armed mercenaries and dogs and tasers when he knew a negotiated settlement was a viable option. He’s angry because despite the millions of tax dollars he hands the so called ‘scribblers of the fourth estate’, embarrassing stories are still leaking out forcing a few of the bribed scribes to occasionally write somewhat critically. And currently he is so angry about accelerating Western challenges to his princely reign that when he travelled to Saskatoon, January 16 for consultations about rare earth minerals with industry leaders, he failed to invite Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe to join the consultations. Trudeau’s apology sounded as hollow as “this simply wasn’t my fault.”

But the most harm Justin Trudeau is causing every Canadian is his unequivocal statement “..that there is no Canadian ‘business case’ for oil and gas.” In fact, that statement from the Prime Minister magnifies his disconnection from reality.

Disconnection, the third word taken from the Trudeau interview. His word not ours! Recently two politicians, leaders of two very wealthy countries, came calling. Both came to see Prime Minister Trudeau about doing something positive about Canada’s great potential for the manufacture of Liquefied Natural Gas. And their desperate need for LNG. The gentlemen represented countries adversely affected by the Russian decision to invade Ukraine. And Canada could make a difference. They came to Canada because they thought we cared.

.

It’s a fact that ninth grade students with a shaky handle on math could immediately see the Connection. They could see the billions of dollars that Canada would realize if it put shoulder to the wheel and moved to sow good relations with two wealthy members of the G7 and reap viable, praiseworthy rewards for Canada. What happened? The Prime Minister in his lofty intellect talked with both men about decarbonizing. And then gave the Chancellor of Germany and the Prime Minister of Japan the ‘bums rush.’ The disconnection is real. Trudeau’s obsession with his ‘global warming’ ambitions has blocked this country’s lucrative future. So why would Canada refuse to fire up a profitable LNG business?

Because Justin Trudeau’s hero is Klaus Schwab. Schwab is of the W.E.F. (World Economic Forum.) He and his cronies including Canada’s deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland were in Davos Switzerland last week, each arriving via private jet. They were there to “warn of the dangers of gas stoves, extol the moral issue of eating bugs not meat and the need to recalibrate our understanding of free speech.” Exactly the program designed to reset this country step for step with the Klaus Schwab club.

How destructive is Trudeau’s disconnection with reality? Germany just signed a 15 year contract with Qatar to buy 2 million tonnes of LNG annually. The Japanese continue their search.

O CANADA!

Daddy delivers a Broadside

The Prime Minister of Canada just stood there, wearing the full role of a vassal to his Liege who then delivered his displeasure by rebuking, the vassal for leaking their recent conversations. Not only was the confrontation extraordinary it was very public! The Chairman of China, in Bali where Potentates, Presidents and Prime Ministers met this year at what they call the G-20 delivering an unvarnished polemic to Canada’s PM in the full view of many G-20 delegates and Media from around the world. XI accused Trudeau of inappropriately leaking the content of their conversations. The Chinese leader indicated their discussions were secret and Trudeau should have understood that. Trudeau interrupted the Chairman to deliver a typical Trudeau platitude. Quoth he, “Canada believes in free and open and frank dialogue.” The Chairman brushed off Trudeau’s attempt at justification. Has probably heard them all! Not surprising Chairman Xi claimed that what Trudeau leaked to the Media was not the accurate reflection of their conversation and although we cannot be sure of all that was said going from (Xi to trans-later to Trudeau back to XI) you receive a very strong indication that the inaccuracies Trudeau’s version shared with the Media made the Chairman angry because somewhere in the coverage of the confrontation Chairman Xi is said to have delivered to Trudeau a threat.

One conclusion among many you can draw from the “Confrontation In Bali” is the headline ,”What does the Xi rebuke mean for Canada’s relations with China? More to the point and much more important to Canadians is, “how much of a Chinese province have we become?” Buttress that question with Trudeau’s obvious dependency on his partnership of platitudes,” we believe in free and open and frank dialogue.” Yes many Canadians believe with sincerity in the importance of “free, open and frank dialogue,”. The Prime Minister does not. If he had been on the ball Trudeau should have been able to wow Chairman Xi with several pro-China “open and shut “examples of his government’s ability, with the help of the subsidized Canadian Media, to hide illegal Chinese operations on Canadian soil: (1) Chairman Xi we were able to bury the information about 11 Canadian politicians elected to our Parliament with Chinese money support, and we’re still stonewalling that one: 2) At the same time we were able to ignore several intelligence reports claiming your government had established three Chinese police stations on Canadian soil, We had that one buried for months by simply telling Canadians it wasn’t happening. Some Dutch whistle blower blew the cover; 3) and remember Canada voted with Beijing on the question of the Uyghers. You must recall I rejected the idea of confirming that the on going human rights issues in Xinjiang province against the Uyghers was genocide. Remember Chairman Xi my clever out on that one, “the term genocide needs to be properly justified and demonstrated”; 4) more recently My Liege we were able to hide from the Canadian people approval of a major 105 million dollar contract to the World Economic Forum. We know how you value the WEF abilities to infiltrate; 5) and in August we surprised everyone with plans to revamp of Canada’s digital infrastructure, It’s called the digital Identity program. Some critics claim it’s a threat to our Charter of Rights and is patterned under your country’s Social Credit System! So you see Chairman Xi we in Canada are working with China helping make the Canadian Utopia happen.

Imagine the Prime Minister pulling all these rabbits out of the political hat and impressing Chairman Xi with these great pro-chinese efforts happening on Canadian soil. Truth is the Chairman knows all about them and may have felt the Ape has climbed too high and needed to brought down a peg, may be two.

Enter the Chairman, a plan, a trans-lator and his victim. Quicker than you can say Bali-high Justin will get the picture. To the Chairman of China being the Canadian most impressed with your own political acumen and successes, “DON’T Mean Very MUCH.

Ignorance is strength

“Things are moving fast, and Canadians should be very concerned that a free and democratic society is quickly headed towards a society where citizens can be cancelled with the flick of a switch.”

That clarion call comes from the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. You’ll find it in a report called, “Canada’s Road to Beijing.” The report quickly delivers two critical observations: (1) that those we have elected to keep watch on our democracy are derelict and (2) that Justin Trudeau is creating his own Canada in the image of the WEF! Some Canadians might be surprised at this declarative sentence: Justin Trudeau and the World Economic Forum introduce phase one of China’s Social Credit System. If you are surprised, you haven’t been paying attention. Insider Correspondent Katie Canales has delineated a detailed SCS account for dummies: “China’s Social Credit system ranks citizens and punishes them with throttled internet speeds and transportation bans if authorities deem them untrustworthy.” Technically the Social Credit System is enabled by the digital universe. Intellectually it is a gift to those who wish to control others. Writer Brad Salzberg observes, “Trudeau’s response to the Freedom Convoy was to institute a dry run of public shaming via the frozen bank account agenda next on Trudeau’s to do list is replication of Communist China’s Social Credit reward system for those travelling inside and outside our country.” In Ottawa the apparatchics refer to it as KTDI. (Known Traveller Digital Identity). To the unwashed it is the WEF’s KNOWN TRAVELLER IDENTITY program. Katie Canales explains, “…in China authorities have created databases of information about their citizens including addresses, family relations, birth control methods and religious affiliations.” In Canada, the Trudeau/Schwab collaboration will begin with hotel, flight and train records. You can be sure biometrics and video footage will be added to their KTDI as the collaboration matures.

Of course like all of Trudeau’s favourite plans, KTDI was a secret until it was revealed in a report titled, “Canada’s Digital Ambition 2022”, published on the Federal Government website August 4, 2022. That’s a curiosity! Historically we know that a significant event of this kind would warrant a Trudeau photo opportunity explaining, with a good measure of self congratulatory bravado, the legitimate plans of his government to use Digital for Social Credit, but there was NO news conference. Curious because KTDI involves a major collaboration with an organization that hates Canada’s democratic system. Even more curious because this secret Trudeau foray into the digital universe also involves Air Canada and two airports (Montreal-Trudeau and Toronto’s Pearson) as well as private corporations like Accenture. Observers just cannot believe that Trudeau would pass up an opportunity so ripe with political fruit. Unless the Prime Minister, in spite of his unquenchable need for the spotlight, is not ready to publicly acknowledge that he is committed to Karl Schwab’s godless World Economic Forum. It’s a fact the developing Social Credit system in Trudeau’s hands will make possible comprehensive data collection that will measure your loyalty to the state!

This edition of holidayatlarge quoted extensively from three published sources:

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms; Insider Correspondent Katie Canales; and Brad Salzberg/Substack.

The last question goes to the editors of Epoch Times—-Why on earth would the Critical report by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms be relegated to A12 of your August 18-24th edition?

KNOW THAT ‘STUDY’ IS NOT ‘RESEARCH’

As it turned out, today, May First, 2022, was a good day to drift through some old stuff in the somewhat dishevelled family library. Coincidental to the drifting there were thoughts about Joe Biden’s latest gambit, “The Ministry of Truth”, and Justin Trudeau’s plans to “license” Canadian journalists. On this library shelf I see, a dozen or more books about UFO’s – a subject clouded by government leaks, followed by denials, followed by more leaks – and next to the UFO’s almost as many books on the JFK take down and cover up. And couldn’t you call this serendipity, out tumbles “1984, by George Orwell“, somewhat tattered, with a cover that’s been abused probably by spilled coffee, price of 85 cents still quite visible, with pages intact. There on page 86, the mantra, “freedom is slavery” and on page 162, “ignorance is strength.” Mantra, a statement or slogan repeated frequently, like “no one is safe until all are safe”, an often repeated reference to the importance of being vaccinated. The unvaccinated, meanwhile continue to be cauterized. The latest broadside was fired by Dr. David Fisman. He conducted a study that obviously found favour with the people at the Canadian Medical Association Journal who published it. Designated a study rather than a research paper, Dr. Fisman, using modelling, claimed the unvaxxed if found in the company of the vaxxed are dangerous because they raise the risk of infection around them. The casualness of that statement suggests no challenge to the conclusion. The speed with which Fisman’s study was picked up by Canada’s MSM (main stream media) classifies it as propaganda on behalf of the the STATES’ view of the unvaxxed! Propaganda almost always crowds the truth and in many cases bears no discernible relationship to veracity. Don’t think so? Look at the framing of the story billboard in all the MSM, (“MIXING WITH UNVACCINATED INCREASES COVID 19 RISK FOR THE VACCINATED: Study”.) No equivocation, just a straight delivery to the reader as fact. There’s no reference in this so called study to repeated official statements telling us get vaccinated and you will not be infected. Here’s something else. The opening sentence refers to a STUDY and the next paragraph begins with a reference to ‘the RESEARCH’. Because this study slanders so many, we need to be clear about the difference between study and research. To study is usually academic. It’s designed to revise materials already learned in order to make sure one doesn’t forget them. While research is to search or examine with continued care; to seek diligently, labouriously, searching after truth. The sum of the difference suggests that Dr. David Fisman deliberately offered a hit piece that diminishes the unvaxxed. And MSM was eager to participate in the piling on and disparagement. But that’s not all. Dr. Fisman’s study is based on modelling. Fisman explains, “we use models in a lot of different ways. They’re just simplified versions of reality.” There’s more than a hint of simplicity in the doctor’s breezy explanation. Most would bluntly affirm there’s no such thing as simplified reality. Dr. Fisman may be a professional but his reliance on modelling for truth produces instant skeptics. All models have limitations because they are not representative of every possible scenario. British statistician George Box said, “all models are wrong. Some are useful.” Next let’s slide over to the desk of one of the many editors that would have approved publishing this study without thought. First check the pulse. You would have thought that after eviscerating the poor unvaccinated pilgrim, the last words of the study would find a place near the first words because Dr. Fisman’s vulnerability is noted but not until all the bullets have been fired. Story concludes, “however he (Dr.Fisman) acknowledges that a simple mathematical model does not fully reflect the real world or diverse factors that must be taken in account when setting public health policy, including political consideration and public anger.” The fact that MSM, now amply subsidized by the taxpayer, would stoop to run the report of a flimsy study, not a peer reviewed research paper, tells us everything we need to know about the deterioration of news reporting in this country. Recent history confirms anger from the Prime Minister comes at the unvaxxed from darkness. Why else would he want to keep the unvaxxed locked up for another three years? He knows this latest violent thrust is un-Canadian. How is it that so few in the Media grasp the obvious. He was outwitted by the Truck Convoy, and that will be the bastard badge he will wear until retired by his patron, Klaus Schwab. Meanwhile Ottawa continues to cover up the truth about the vaxxed. In Ontario, they are supporting daily numbers that show more than 20 deaths a day and several thousand new infections. But health officials are not admitting that at least 80% of those infections are among the vaccinated. The cover up provides fertile ground for studies like the one from Dr. Fisman that are used to play the unvaxxed as patsies, Canadians, characterized as extremists, misogynists, racists, and worse in the privacy of the Prime Ministers office. What kind of a man demonizes millions of fellow countrymen? And holds them hostage without due process! We know he is ‘of the people’ responsible for the monumental mismanagement of the pandemic.

The God they don’t believe exists has a reward for each one.

YOU CAN MAKE THIS STUFF UP!

Examples of this STUFF tumble out almost hourly from the medical, political and technical people. And this STUFF includes myths that will not die no matter the validity of challenging protocol. Today Peter Juni, who sits at the head of the Science Table, estimated 30,000 to 35,000 Ontario residents are walking around with Covid. What solid, positive and unassailable proof did Juni have in his hot little hand that supported his estimate? He said it was based on viral levels measured in waste water. Who was his source(s)? Because of his ability to take out and put back the “Science Table genie” at will, we need to see the mathematics. We need to hear from a legitimate professional who will delineate the bafflegab that Juni reported. Juni is dangerous because he’s ad libbing unverified conclusions that are broadcast across the province without challenge. He just made it up! On the other hand we have some official new infections data based on actual testing as confirmed by the Ontario Health Ministry. It shows the number of new infections for March 31 to be 3139. The Ministry also tells us the 3139 is an under-estimate due to testing restrictions. That means the Ministry cannot say for sure how many people in Ontario are walking around with Covid today. But over there is Peter Juni, a doctor on his soapbox billowing wild unconfirmed numbers. He’s blowing smoke through his political foghorn. But that’s not all. Juni disagrees with the Ford decision to unburden citizens of masks, vaccine mandates, quarantines first thrust upon us to flatten the curve that would not be flattened. From the depth of his intransigence Juni makes this statement, “the highly infectious Omicron sub variant cannot be blamed for Ontario’s rising case count, but rather the increase in transmission can mostly be linked to the lifting of pandemic restrictions.” And on what basis does this paragon of medicinal virtue speak these words? He provides no evidence to back up that statement but by saying this, he is trying to marshall support from those who accept without questioning his baseless palaver. He is challenging the political decision to give living without mindless restrictions some air. Frankly, these clouds of bafflegab from Juni and other self righteous tin horns who think they have godlike abilities to devine the past, present and future need to be blown away by common sense. Real stats tell us Covid numbers here are rising but not nearly as dramatically as Dr. Juni speculates. Let’s face it, his scribbler shows no documentation for another pressure point he has directed at the political decision makers. The head of the Science Table said, “the point here really is it’s entirely our responsibility what we’re seeing and we just got a little bit too much ahead of ourselves and here we are.” Another shot at the Ford Braintrust, and braintrust is a stretch, but Juni is totally out step because he brings nothing substantive to this verbal runoff. He is challenging Ford with an empty arsenal. And you know Juni is talking just for the sake of talking when he says, “…and we just have our task at hand to keep the slope of the wave upwards relatively flat so that we are not challenged in our hospitals.” Let’s leave Juni’s verbal contortions and move to another Doctor from whom we’ve been hearing. Dr. Isaak Bogoch is representative spokesman for UHN (University Health Network). He’s an infectious diseases expert. In spite of numerous studies that cast serious doubt on the ability of masking to prevent Covid from getting to you, Dr. Bogoch loves masks. Yesterday he suggested that the Ford decision relative to masking was questionable considering the belief that Ontario is now confronted with the 6th wave. Bogoch says, ”I think if people continue to wear masks and most people wear masks it will help blunt the 6th wave.” Does he believe that or did he just make it up? The numerous probes conducted into masks should be enough to convince the honest, clear thinking doctors there is much doubt about the efficacy of masking. Let me refer to one. In late February, (8) industrial hygienists called the CDC mask guidance substantially flawed. In the 28 page letter they wrote to the CDC, NIH, and other top flight health authorities, the industrial hygienists pointed out they represented a combined 150 years experience in the field of industrial hygiene. For the sake of brevity here are their four key points: 1) Recommending N-95 masks is inappropriate for the general population and children 2) CDC has issued harmful guidance for masking children that contradicts manufacturers recommendations, world wide standard practice and the CDC’s own guidance, and without appropriate risk-benefit analysis 3) The CDC continues to ignore the fact that COVID-19 is primarily spread by aerosol (not droplets) making mask use mostly ineffective 4) CDC’s position for masks used by the general public lacks proper scientific justification and creates potential harm based on a false sense of security. And the conclusion of this group of highly knowledgeable 8 industrial hygienists is easy to understand:

“The CDC is doing enormous damage to science and scientists by allowing politics to dictate public health policy rather than actual science.” Within two weeks, the CDC changed some of its mask related policies without publicly acknowledging the letter from the hygienists.

Nobody in Canada seems to recall that letter. And mask wearing policy, at least in Ontario. has not been altered. Reflecting on the words of Dr. Bogoch on the absolutely positive aspects of mask wearing to combat the 6th wave, you could conclude he is not influenced in this case by science. How many of the rules and regulations imposed on us have been based on anti-Science? Maybe the masters of the COVID challenge have been making it up? Who says you can’t make this stuff up! W.H.O. did.

Next: the flim and the flam.

…and you can fool all of the people some of the time……..

Call this a classic example of how to achieve irrelevance at the stroke of a pen! The so-called ‘supply and confidence‘ agreement between Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh is really an agreement to supply Trudeau with the confidence to take full control of his agenda. It’s the fulfilment of the vision that evaded him on September 30th, 2021. Wow, there is a fairy princess that rewards political scoundrels. Jagmeet Singh is the answer to Justin’s desire to run a country just like Chairman Xi does. Power is all Trudeau wants and now he has it. But what about his partner, the one that just turned his back on the 3 million, 36 thousand, 348 Canadians who voted for Singh and the party he was leading in the last election? What happens to 17.83% of the electorate that has just become a statistic? Read political refugees! Of course The Justin-Jagmeet agreement enunciates the motherhood issues. They include climate change, health care spending, economic growth and efforts to make life more affordable, issues espoused by New Democrats everywhere. But this agreement is designed for a leader and a follower. The nexus of the pact puts Trudeau in control of the legislative agenda for the next three years supported by Jagmeet Singh. Every vote of confidence, every budgetary initiative will be tabled by the leader and supported by the follower. Simple Simon meets the Pieman. Singh naively believes, “I will remain critical, we’re going to remain an opposition party.” No you won’t. You have been emasculated. It gets worse. Not only do the New Democrats have to support Trudeau on his confidence and monetary initiatives, but if the opposition brings forward what Trudeau considers a frivolous motion designed to interfere with his agenda, he will inform Singh this is now a matter of confidence and his group of emasculated MPs must support the government. Essentially you are looking at this picture, the people versus Justin Trudeau. It’s a reality of several situations; Erdogan in Turkey, Putin in Russia, Xi in China, Kim Jong-un in North Korea, to name a few. Canada’s government is now a “coalition of planning” in which the Prime Minister gets absolute support on legislation that absent the Singh-Trudeau hookup would be a Mission of the Impossible. The (supply & confidence) pact means every motion of non-confidence will be vaporized!

Grudgingly you have to admire Trudeau the lesser. In the space of seven years he has eliminated Harper, Scheer, O’Toole, and Mulcair without firing a shot. And now he has neutralized Singh, who might have been his most persistent critic while a prospective Conservative leader is months away from the debate. Justin Trudeau’s World Economic Forum patron Klaus Schwab will be very pleased.

You can fool some of the people all of the time….

Prime Minister Trudeau’s latest trip to Europe strikes some Canadians as odd. For several reasons. The news release heralding his imminent departure was fulsome, in part. It details every European influencer with whom he will meet but not exactly why. Trudeau doesn’t seem to be a factor on the minds of key European politicians day to day. Mostly they view Canada politely but hardly a major influence against a backdrop of the war in Ukraine. Yes they appreciate our humanitarian support but militarily we are not a factor. We have been shipping some secondary weapons but most of Canada’s contribution is described as non-lethal. Not surprising. Our annual defense expenditures are meagre. And we don’t know whether we can help with the oil deficit. So nobody in Europe was expecting the Prime Minister of Canada would be arriving with heavy duty weapons of war and a billion dollars in aid for the Ukrainians. So why was he coming for 5 days? The itinerary rivaled a state visit. I think we could be forgiven if we postulate at least two additional reasons for the now concluded carefully choreographed 5 days in Europe. Because the PM is never transparent about planning and execution we must by necessity speculate. It’s quite possible his main strategist, Gerald Butts, the high profile fall guy of the SNC-Lavalin scandal provided another reason for Trudeau’s trip. Butts continues to provide the best strategic advice Trudeau and the Liberals can get. He’s brilliant. And his thinking might have been…”look Prime Minister your encounter with the Ottawa protesters did not help your popularity. Your standing among the polled shows almost 60% negative. Your refusal to meet with the Convoy reps was not good, because it gave your opponents an opportunity to dig up your quotes like, ‘…..you can’t negotiate when only one party comes to the table..’ …and that’s just one. Calling the dogs out to handle a peaceful protest prolonged by your ill-advised intransigence is another. Add to that your declaration that the state of emergency was not over because there were signs the Freedom Convoy truckers were regrouping and planning to return to Ottawa …I could go on Prime Minister but I won’t because I have another brilliant idea! Let’s make this trip to Europe a combo–one designed to further strengthen Canada’s solidarity with Ukrainians as they battle the Russian horde and two a high profile visit promoting a state of community with Europe. We have a major political deficit and this trip can deliver substantial political capital. Meetings in four or five cities plus an audience with the Queen and a wind-up day mingling with and speaking to Ukrainian refugees. From start to finish heavy on photo-ops and statements of heartfelt sympathy. This is a not to be a missed opportunity to fix the eyes of the world on you.”

My other trip scenario falls squarely on stewardship.

‘No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other; or else he will be devoted to one and despise the other!’

Justin Trudeau has cast himself into the untenable role of shilling for the World Economic Forum while at the same time trying to fulfill his role as Prime Minister. Unfortunately Justin Trudeau has turned his back on Canadians because of his loyalty to Klaus Schwab and the WEF. Examination of the reasons for Trudeau’s European trip suggest it was designed to coincide with key priorities of the WEF, in addition to the top of mind subject Ukraine. In London, Trudeau met with several members of the the World Economic Forum including British PM Boris Johnson and Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte. The World Economic Forum was well represented by the Canadian delegation: there was the Prime Minister, deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland and Foreign Affairs Minister Melanie Joly. The penetration of the Canadian cabinet by the World Economic Forum starts right at the top. Additionally, at every stop, Trudeau trotted out two WEF favorities, climate change and elimination of fossil fuels. It is difficult to ascertain Trudeau’s end game with respect to his Canadian stewardship and his own projection on the Schwab starship. Some think he sees himself as the proconsul in the WEF hierarchy, possibly more than that. The just completed tour of four countries with pictures likely had the blessing of Schwab, who has announced to the world that Justin Trudeau is a WEF recruit in whom he is well pleased. Fellow Canadians need to digest the words of the Prime Minister delivered to the United Nations in September 2020. He said…..”this pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to re-imagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change!” Trudeau’s reference to the “Great Reset’ harvested howls from the uninitiated charging: “conspiracy theory” and “fake news”.

I would suggest the Former Governor of the Bank of Canada and Governor of the Bank of England does not engage his time among fanciful theories and chimerical dreams and neither does Klaus Schwab!!

.

The biggest liability in the room

When the members of the Liberal caucus jettisoned two former Trudeau cabinet ministers, Jody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpot, they exhibited the essence of the herd mentality. Blinded by their belief in the political invincibility of Justin Trudeau, caucus members like Judy Sgro, Carolyn Bennett, Salma Zahid and the other female members of the Caucus couldn’t wait to throw out two of their best. We watched as the weasels took over the landscape denying Jody Wilson-Raybould an opportunity to return and continue her testimony before the Liberal-dominated Justice committee. They didn’t want to hear anything more. The weasels didn’t want to hear it even though Jane Philpot said there was more, and the Liberal-dominated Ethics committee was also denied the right to hear the more. Trudeau the Lesser didn’t want the more discussed. All efforts to shutdown the story of SNC Lavalin and the DPA were directed by the PMO and the rest of us knew it. So when a pollster came back with the numbers, it was obvious that Justin Trudeau was the biggest liability in the Liberal Caucus. 46% of those surveyed wanted him to resign. The Liberals may not know it but their leader has the qualities that can lead them back into the political wilderness.

Uncomprehending members of the Caucus threw out with venom Jane Philpot and Jody Wilson-Raybould.

They did so without contemplating the obvious, that the Prime Minister is the biggest liability in that caucus. It’s his arrogance, and mendacious portrayal of both, his disagreements with JWR, and the reason she had to be kicked out of caucus that would require right thinking members among the Liberals to come to a full stop and digest one of the latest polls calling on the Prime Minister to resign. 46% said resign!

Obviously the lead weasel is the Prime Minister who leaked stories to the Star and the CBC about a power play involving the PMO and JWR. Dutifully, like the PM knew they would, both media outlets reported the stories. Now some Canadians might have believed the yarn about a power struggle, most assuredly Koolaid drinking Liberals would, but it doesn’t take a mensa member to look at the players to figure out Le Canard! She is a former cabinet minister, He is the Prime Minister! A power struggle? Please!

So they threw her out and threw dirt on her and said nasty things about her. But the biggest liability in the Liberal Caucus remains. Justin Trudeau, member of Parliament for Papineau, is the puppeteer in chief.

Who was managing the campaign to wring a concession from the country’s Attorney-General with respect to SNC Lavalin? Who recruited his top toadies (high officials like Butts, Wernick, Morneau) to point out to JWR that Lavalin was a “signature” company that was in need of our compassion? Who passed along the word to Madame Attorney-General that the puppet master was quite determined to win for his good friends at the “signature” company in QUEBEC! When the four month harangue failed to get you know who his victory, he shuffled Madame to a lesser portfolio. And who accepted her resignation from the cabinet? And then when the Globe and Mail reported that JWR had been subjected to unceasing bursts of lobbying by the PMO, who denied the story?

But thank goodness the Attorney-General’s head was on straight. Faced with the continuing harangue from the Trudeau juggernaut, knowing that the Prime Minister’s people would lie about the intensity of the lobbying, she devised a brilliant plan. She turned on a tape machine and for posterity recorded the words of Michael Wernick, Clerk of the Privy Council, who spoke to the SNC Lavalin problem that she was creating. Later when Wernick testified to members of the Justice committee, he of course had a different version. The Wrong version. We now know the rest of that story.

Forward to the day the Liberal Caucus jettisoned Jody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpot. The biggest Caucus Liability remained. Because he has trouble separating fact from fiction, cannot admit to making a grievous mistake, and while his manner of speaking is breezy, he cannot communicate sincerity and heart-searching observations. He could have scored a ten-bagger with his Caucus and the country by getting off his high horse and delivering what we should expect from a man who wants to do the right thing. But he didn’t.

He needed to convince the Caucus members that this standoff must come to an end for the sake of the members present, the national party and the country. He would have been within his rights to walk back much of the ongoing anti-JWR and Philpot palaver and the more virulent caucus misstatements about these two fine women who have asked to remain “with us.” He needed to say justice is not served by giving SNC Lavalin a free pass. He could have admitted making a mistake! His rallying cry should have been, “We need them, you need them, we can work it out.”

So what did he do instead and because he didn’t have a legitimate, honest reason for kicking JWR out of Caucus? He devised what he and his advisers felt was a winning play, throw dirt at the woman, make her the heavy! He included Jane Philpot in this juvenile self righteous diatribe but no one knows why.

Trudeau’s big reveal zeroed in on the tape but of course he refused to acknowledge that the message delivered on the tape proved the woman he was vilifying spoke truth. He knew it but didn’t have the mojo to admit it. Instead:

He said, “if a politician secretly records a conversation with anyone, it’s wrong. When that cabinet minister is the Attorney-General of Canada secretly recording the Clerk of the Privy Council, it is unconscionable.”

Pardon me while I take a moment to characterize these quotes: this is Rama-Lama Ding Dong stuff by Ishkabibble.

There is a good use for recording devices and despite Trudeau’s babble about what’s “wrong” and “unconscionable”, Jody Wilson-Raybould used hers to catch the country’s political braintrust in a lie and a cover-up and that’s why he threw her out to the cheers of the weasels who didn’t understand that their hero is still the biggest liability in the caucus!


Manipulation

There’s something very odd about the Prime Minister’s behavior over the last 6 months. He has been making decisions and statements that are both confusing and contradictory. The two strangest situations I’m thinking about involve major decisions that have unsteadied the people and unsettled the political landscape. The FIRST deals with the growing divisiveness over “passports of vaccination”, the SECOND has placed this country in the middle of an unnecessary and costly national election. Consider this–on March 12, less than 7 months ago, Justin Trudeau firmly declared NO to passports in Canada. He emphasized the point in a followup interview shared with Reuters in February. Justin Trudeau was asked for a Canadian position on the growing clamour for Covid Passports in Europe and the States. He said, “many Canadians will likely choose to not get vaccinated and will have many reasons including valid medical reasons for choosing not to do that.” He continued, “..making vaccine passports mandatory when many will choose not to get vaccinated could lead to unexpected, undesirable effects that as Canadian Prime Minister I want to avoid.” And he wasn’t finished making what at the time appeared to be his incontrovertible position on the subject of imposing a caste system on Canadians. His last points underscored what appeared to be his firm opinion on the matter, quote, ” The indication that a vast majority of Canadians are looking to get vaccinated will get us to a good place without having to take more extreme measures that could have real divisive impacts.” end quote. Now I, and many others, took his words to mean–NO NATIONAL PASSPORTS for CANADA. No caste system. Wow! Take a look at a classic 180. Friday August, 27 this same Justin Trudeau dangled a billion dollars taken from his favorite cookie jar and coupled the bribe with a threat to punish provinces like Ontario if Doug Ford doesn’t implement a vaccine passport system. Ford who rejected the idea of a domestic Covid 19 passport less that a month ago has folded like a tent in a storm. The smart money said Ontario would have a passport plan by Wednesday. WE got it Tuesday. Adamant against in March! Bullying and bribing in favour in August! Who is pulling the passport strings in Canada? Think about it. It’s not Trudeau. Who then? Think the “GreatResetCabal”. And while I have no proof, I can offer evidentiary support that something or someone is s:fooling with this country’s political well-being. Consider this: In May of this year Prime Minister Trudeau and the rest of the members of the Commons, with one exception, voted on a motion that pledged no election during this pandemic. He was adamant. No unnecessary spending of 610-million dollars. It will be the most expensive election in Canadian history.

In June he repeated the position taken by the members of Parliament. No election during the pandemic! Then a few weeks later, his covid curls and slightly greying beard were gone and somebody yelled, “election coming.” The decision is very strange. He pledged his political word in May to eschew a political power grab in the middle of a deadly pandemic and by July he was persuaded to break another promise and visit the Governor-General, in itself a hasty installation. Recall what he said about passport imposition in February and again in March, “..because a majority of Canadians are looking to get vaccinated, that will get us to a good place without having to take more extreme measures that could have real, divisive impacts.” Recall his pledge—no pandemic vote. Two major decisions widely disseminated then suddenly two major national decisions cast aside. Both reversals conjure foreign influences. Has Trudeau fallen under the spell of the same cabal that has turned Joe Biden and his staff into the gang that couldn’t shoot straight?

Whatever the influences, the behavior of the Prime Minister has been odd!

Two Trudeau pirouettes and behold a costly election and an uneven vaccine passport rollout!

Bizarre!

Justin at the Stone Wall

In May, 2015 Justin Trudeau, Canada’s Prime Minister, walked in the March for Genocide Prevention. On February 22, 2021 Trudeau and his Cabinet abstained from voting on a parliamentary initiative that called China’s actions against the Uyghur Muslims, a “genocide.” Recalling this hypocrisy gives us a dramatic picture from a pantheon crowded with examples displaying Trudeau’s scurrilous attitude toward truth and transparency, the favorite words of the political cabal. One of his favorite places to end unwanted, embarrassing questions about his stewardship is the Stone Wall. For many people the list is a surprise…surprise as in “I don’t pay much attention to politics.” Certainly this attitude among Canadians has helped fuel the JUSTIN mystique. That he is firm, fair and honest. Trudeau for his part has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar so often the people want to give it to him. And in fact he is asking for it on September 20. His most recent eyebrow raising politics and deceit adventure involved his friendship with Tom Pitfield. Tom’s daddy Michael was a longtime influential political adviser to Trudeau the Elder. The friendship between Justice and Tom has endured and both have prospered. In this case the Ethics Commissioner was called on to check on a scheme in which some Liberal MPs hired Tom Pitfield’s company to help them spend tax dollars allocated to them to pay for the running of their offices. The money was handled by the Liberal Research Bureau. The Ethics Commissioner says he checked it out, and while the Prime Minister is responsible for the Liberal Research Bureau, the Commissioner accepted that he, (the PM), delegated his authority. So the Ethics Commissioner concluded if that’s the case the PM didn’t know a thing and therefore could not have suggested his friend’s companies be favoured to help spend the MPs tax money. Another Trudeau decision revolved around the WE Charity. Well, didn’t it turn into a major scandal featuring big money paid to the Trudeau family for helping WE. Chunks of tax dollars were handed to the WE two guys–and we watched as the PM kept getting deeper and deeper into the nefarious, iniquitous and the impenetrable. Mendacity was the star! As more and more snippets came to light, the Opposition called on a committee to probe exactly what was going on. The Liberals on the committee with the help of the Quebecois came to the Prime Minister’s rescue. His stone- walling and delaying tactics helped him run the WE table right into a dead end – the Stone Wall. Subsequently, 6 billion dollars were sent along to Quebec, possibly as a thank you for bailing out the Prime Minister. The fact is we never got the real story of the WE Charity debacle. There are many similar stories in the PM’s CV. His decision to force an election in the middle of a pandemic should automatically be a referendum on the stewardship of Justin Pierre James Trudeau. For one, the man needs to be challenged for his vaccine procurement disaster.

He has taken this nation on a nasty ride. And if the sight of the sleek government plane with the giant letters spelling out TRUDEAU sitting on a tarmac in a city near you doesn’t inspire a sense of foreboding, it should. His reckless spending on the pandemic with no Parliamentary oversight displays fiduciary flimflam. But think how enormous an ego must be to abandon sane judgement and sanity to call an unnecessary election in the midst of a pandemic. His self seeking persona amplifies the waste. This election will cost 610 million dollars. And for what? For HIS right to continue to wear the imperial crown fashioned to fit his ill-conceived ideas. The victory that Trudeau is seeking will turn Parliament into an instrument of tyranny.

During the last year of the Parliamentary session just terminated, his government placed itself above Parliament on two occasions. Trudeau challenges the supremacy of Parliament. His cabinet cannot be counted on to speak for the people on any issue. They watched the dismemberment of Jody Wilson-Raybould. Where were their voices when a throwback to Joseph Goebbels introduced Bill 10? It was an odious piece of legislation designed specifically to shut down the freedom to speak about issues of importance. Fear not if the incumbent is returned to office, BillC-10 will be resurrected. Do you expect truth and transparency from His Highness? Don’t! Remember how he browbeat and drove from office the Country’s Attorney-General over an issue involving Friends of the Party. Was he sorry? You’re kidding right. She’s gone! He’s busy on the huge campaign plane with his friends, members of the media. On the eve of the campaign, Justin Trudeau laid down another 61 million dollars on the Media to help them tell the Trudeau story the right way! His way! It was called pre-election “emergency relief” to ensure readers receive “timely information they require from their government.”

Of course it’s our money. After all, he grew up living on the Family Trust.